Search for Online Courses

Plain Advice On Locating Root Aspects In Company Certification

You Can Acquire A Good Position In An Organization Based On Your Experience And Certification.

Certified Information Security Manager ism: This is an advanced certification from the ISACA, for experienced professionals in the field of information security. Which three categories of HMS do provide? Use “To Whom it May Concern” only when you do not know the addressee’s name. Further, the employee himself will elaborate on this experience in his resume. Certified Information Systems Security Professional cissy: A certification from the non profit International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium ISC2.

To Permanently Remove This Message Please Consider To White List Our Website.

Forests for the World Satellite data clearly shows that the when the land was acquired by the company, it was forested. Any rattan previously grown on the land was the responsibility of Keresa Plantations itself, after clearing the natural forest on the land. An evaluation of publicly available documents shows that not only did Keresa Plantations have an effective lease to the land during the time it was deforested, the company recorded proceeds from the sale of timber between 1995 and 1999. Basic facts stated in publicly available financial records for Keresa Plantations seem to have been overlooked by RSPO auditors. According to official land transaction records from Sarawak, leaked by Sarawak Report , Keresa Plantations land in the Lavang Land District was allocated as a concession to the company with the purpose of cultivating rattan, a fast-growing non-timber species of vine found natively in South East Asia. Company financial statements indicate that both oil palm and rattan were developed in parallel beginning in 1996. Keresa Plantations financial reports make references to trial plantings for rattan being harvested as early as May 2000. If Keresa Plantations developed oil palm over land that previously hosted rattan planting, it should not be excluded from assessment of the companys responsibility for clearing forests, which satellite imagery confirms the land contained until its conversion under Keresa Plantations management. Satellite imagery from Landsat confirms that by 2005, much of the forest which previously covered the plantation had been cleared. One RSPO audit report for Keresa Plantations said that an independent bodyapproved by the RSPO as an assessor, had undertaken a HCV Assessment prior to development in 2005, and found an absence of protected, rare, or threatened species. An assessment in 2005, almost a decade after deforestation began, to evaluate whether high-conservation value (HCV) areas existed in the plantation is functionally meaningless. (To see Keresa Plantations’ deforestation over time lapse imaging, click here for 1986-2002 and here for 2002-2010 .*) The forest cleared for oil palm plantings by Keresa Plantations was not untouched. However, the ample logging roads visible throughout the concession in satellite imagery, and the companys own sale of timber sourced there for several years show that, before clearance by the company, this forest was rich enough to support marketable tropical timber species. When an assessment of nearby smallholder lands was carried out in 2011, several endangered species [were] identified. The completion of the conversion on Keresa Plantations land from forest to plantation takes place around the same time the company was accepted as an ordinary member of the RSPO in 2009, led by director Graeme Brown.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit

When a government uses part of its $3-billion tax hit to fund “government support” for wind, solar and other corporations, there are two useful words to describe the practice: corporate welfare. Others can debate whether Danish environmentalist and statistician Bjorn Lomborgs suggestion of adapting to any observed changes in climate (no denier he) is preferable to costly, poverty-creating attempts to stop it. Instead, Ill dissect the premiers claim that her carbon tax is revenue neutral and her methods are market friendly. The assertion reveals insincerity on taxes and slipshod ignorance on how markets work. The premiers $3-billion tax increase taxes every Albertan and everything. Unhelpfully, it will raise costs and make Alberta more expensive just as the market, to which the premier claims fealty, is literally marking goods and services down in price, this to balance an oversupply of goods and services with lower demand. This natural act between consenting market forces (over supply, meet lower demand) makes the price for all that stuff extra labour, idled oil rigs, unused office space more affordable. It keeps more people working than if costs stay boom-time high. So the process saves jobs, unless some other force artificially pushes up prices again which is where the provincial government comes in. The NDP premier claims her $3-billion tax is revenue neutral. But neutrality exists when a new tax is imposed and another one is reduced by the same amount. Thats opposite the provinces plan to keep much of its $3-billion carbon cash tax to later spend.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit

Further, the employee himself will elaborate on this experience in his resume. Besides these, it should say a few things about the candidate, that allows the prospective employer to get a better idea about that person. Rigorous tests are conducted in order to award the certificates. The authority letter has to be extremely precise and should leave absolutely no room for ambiguity. Donna has always been highly self-motivated from the very start, a good example being her absorption into the company from an intern to a full-time employee in a short span of three months.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *